Order by phone 1-866-808-5635 (M-F 10am - 4pm CST) Help/FAQs / LawRewards / Gift Certificates

Your Discount Online Law Bookstore!

My Cart 0 $0.00
Only $48.99 until FREE SHIPPING!
Only $48.99 until FREE SHIPPING!
  • Menu
  • Account

Order by phone 1-866-808-5635 (M-F 9am-5pm CST)

Criminal Procedure Case and Statutory Supplement (Instant Digital Access Code Only)

  • Edition : 2024
  • Author(s) : Chemerinsky, Levenson
    • SKU: 93716E
    • Format: Digital Access Code Only

    $60.00

    Digital Product FAQs

    • Instant Access!

Order now to get INSTANT ACCESS to the full ebook version of the text; outlining and case briefing tools; and other resources — just redeem the access code sent in your order confirmation email!


Intended for use with any of the authors’ three casebooks for Criminal Procedure—all of which were revised in 2022—the 2024 Case and Statutory Supplement combines two objectives: first, it covers the cases decided in the 2021-2023 Supreme Court terms; second, it provides important statutory material related to each of the casebooks’ chapters.

New to the 2024 Edition:
Significant new decisions and materials, among them:

  • Analysis of important, recent decisions in the area of Criminal Procedure, including several decisions from the Supreme Court’s most recent terms and discussion of policy issues at the forefront of criminal law
  • Changes in Investigation chapters:
    • New case: Vega v. Tekoh (the ability to sue police for violating Miranda v. Arizona)
  • Changes in Adjudication chapters:
    • Erlinger v. United States (enhanced sentencing issues under Armed Career Criminal Act must be submitted to a jury)
    • McGrath v. Georgia (an acquittal stemming from a jury’s verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity also bars a retrial)
    • Smith v. Arizona (substitute expert testimony is subject to Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause analysis)
    • Additional new cases include United States v. Tsarnaev (pretrial publicity and jury selection); Bucklew v. Precythe (method of execution); Denezpi v. United States (dual sovereignty exception to the double jeopardy rule); Samia v. United States (Bruton problems); Smith v. United States (double jeopardy rules in venue cases)
  • Amended Rules 16(a)(1)(G) and 16(b)(1)(C) (Expert Witnesses)