Order by phone 1-866-808-5635 (M-F 10am - 4pm CST) Help/FAQs / LawRewards / Gift Certificates / Sell Us Your Law School Textbooks

Your Discount Online Law Bookstore!

My Cart 0 $0.00
Only $48.99 until FREE SHIPPING!
Only $48.99 until FREE SHIPPING!
  • Menu
  • Account

Order by phone 1-866-808-5635 (M-F 9am-5pm CST)

Emanuel Law Outlines: Constitutional Law

  • Edition : 42nd ed., 2025
  • Author(s) : Emanuel
    • ISBN: 9798894104263
    • SKU: 30002
    • Condition: New
    • Format: Paperback

    $66.19

    List Price: $68.95

    Out Of Stock

    CLICK HERE to get notified when this item is back in-stock!

    Get notified when this product is back in stock

    • SKU: 30002E
    • Format: Digital Access Code Only

    $59.00

    List Price: $68.95

    Digital Product FAQs

    • Instant Access!

ABOUT THE BOOK—TOOLS TO SUCCEED 

  • The Capsule Summary provides a quick reference summary of the key concepts covered in the full Outline.
  • The detailed course Outline with black letter principles supplements your casebook reading throughout the semester and gives structure to your own outline.
  • The Quiz Yourselffeature includes a series of short-answer questions and sample answers to help you test your knowledge of the chapter’s content. 
  • Exam Tips alert you to issues and commonly used fact patterns found on exams.
  • The Casebook Correlation Chart correlates each section in the Outline with the pages covering that topic in the major casebooks.

INCLUDED IN THIS NEW EDITION OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW EMANUEL® LAW OUTLINE
Coverage of key 2023–2024 Supreme Court developments, including:

  • Trump v. U.S., holding that Presidents are entitled to at least a presumption of immunity from criminal prosecution for their official acts. In some contexts, the immunity is absolute, and in others, the President benefits from a strong “presumption of immunity” that will be difficult for the prosecution to rebut.
  • U.S. v. Rahimi, a Second Amendment case, holding that government may restrict certain persons from owning guns. However, the restriction must be “relevantly similar” to restrictions that existed in 1791.
  • Moody v. NetChoice, LLC, indicating that government likely violates the free-expression rights of a social media platform if government enacts an “anti-censorship” rule that requires the platform to include third-party posts that the platform wants to keep off the site.
  • Murthy v. Missouri, a case about standing, holding that a plaintiff does not have standing unless she can show that a favorable outcome in the suit would “redress” the harm from whatever action (usually a government action) the plaintiff is challenging.